Good, bad & ugly restored dvd

[quote]Someone else if dubbing Lee Van Cleef’s lines? That’s fuckin gay.[/quote]

Yep. Lee Van Cleef has been dead since -89 or something like that. The Italian scenes weren’t dubbed in English until 2001 or 2002, some 35 years after the original. That’s why it’s hard to believe not hearing the change in Clint’s or anyone else’s voice over such perioid of time.



But I don’t know if you do hear any alterings or not, I haven’t seen the restored version yet.

Here’s a review of the Region 2 package (Which is sure to be the same as Region 1)



http://www.dvddebate.com/article.php?sid=4035



Sounds like a must-buy!

[quote]Here’s a review of the Region 2 package (Which is sure to be the same as Region 1)



http://www.dvddebate.com/article.php?sid=4035



Sounds like a must-buy![/quote]

Yeah, it is a must-buy :slight_smile: !

awsome, does any one no when it will be released in Australia. i was gona buy that trilogy pack but this looks to good to refuse.

[quote]awsome, does any one no when it will be released in Australia. i was gona buy that trilogy pack but this looks to good to refuse.[/quote]

why dont you just order it at cd-wow.com or something. they ship worldwide for free, no need to wait for the australian release date

would that make it ntsc. cause i hear that pal compared to ntsc. pal is so much better. as in quality.

[quote]would that make it ntsc. cause i hear that pal compared to ntsc. pal is so much better. as in quality.[/quote]

yes and no. if they have a pal master and make a pal dvd out of it, the quality is better than making a ntsc dvd from a ntsc master. because Pal has more lines on screen.



BUT if you make a pal from a ntsc master, it’s gonna be in pal but the quality wouldnt be much better than the ntsc origin. its the same thing the other way around.

could u kind of explain that better to me. by pal master do u mean a pal dvd play, or pal tv or somthing. i had a region 4 dvd play but i made it play all regions.

I just saw this movie for the first time. it kicked ass.

[quote]I just saw this movie for the first time. it kicked ass.[/quote]

Yeah, simply a brilliant film. For me, its the best Spaghetti Western ever made.

I’ve only seen one Spaghetti, unless Hang 'Em High is a spaghetti (but I don’t think it was made in Italy, so probably not.)

[quote]I’ve only seen one Spaghetti, unless Hang 'Em High is a spaghetti (but I don’t think it was made in Italy, so probably not.)[/quote]

Its not really a Spaghetti, its more a Spaghetti Hommage.



Another great Eastwood movie is “High Plains Drifter”! A brutal and suggestive Revenge-Spaghetti-Western at its fuckin best!

I liked Hang 'Em High a lot.



It was kinda weird because it was really fast-paced compared to the other Spaghettis. The GBU was really slow-paced, but it was better that way than it would have been if it were fast-paced.



Have you seen The Outlaw Josey Wales?

no we do not change the topic to “what spaghetti westerns have we uneducated highschool kids seen already”.

[quote]no we do not change the topic to “what spaghetti westerns have we uneducated highschool kids seen already”.[/quote]


ok, well fine then, we'll take it somewhere else.

you don't have to be so strict about the subject changing. it's still relatively related to GBU, so I don't get what's so wrong with the subject shifting a little. Somebody else can always eventually shift it back.

all this off topic nonsense and my question is still waiting to be awnsered.

[quote]all this off topic nonsense and my question is still waiting to be awnsered.[/quote]


what the fuck is your question?

[quote]all this off topic nonsense and my question is still waiting to be awnsered.[/quote]

what’s your point Walter?

[quote]could u kind of explain that better to me. by pal master do u mean a pal dvd play, or pal tv or somthing. i had a region 4 dvd play but i made it play all regions.[/quote]

[quote]
[/quote]

ok there are 2 different major systems. the PAL system (Europe) uses more lines and therefore has a better quality - if the source material (i.e. the master) is a PAL content. the NTSSC system (USA and Japan) uses not as many lines as PAL and is theoretically of minor quality.



now if you make PAL DVD from a PAL master the quality is better than if you make a NTSC DVD from a NTSC master, because the systems are different.

if you make a PAL DVD from an NTSC master, the difference is not important, because the source material was NTSC anyway, and you have to fill those additional lines with some stuff, so the end product could even have worse quality.



if you make a NTSC DVD from a PAL master its the same, you loose lines, that means you lose quality. but the question is: can the human eye seee the difference on a standard TV? no



→ you need a PAL TV to watch PAL DVDs. Same with NTSC.

region 4 (Australia) uses the PAL system.