A PF 2 could actually work.
Even though both Vic and Vincent die in the other films.
It could have Jules “walking the earth” telling stories of the past. Which will then go to flashback and we would see Vic and Vincent and what they got upto earlier. Think Godfather II, but with Sam Jackson and co instead. 
That’s actually a very good idea. Tuchai.
The prequel idea I think is alright…
but I dont believe it should be advertised or even MADE as the prequel to Pulp Fiction.
I would just like to see the Vega brothers as a movie in itself, perhaps with little subtle hints to something that would happen later on in Pulp Fiction, or maybe flashbacks to something that happened prior- in Reservoir Dogs.
Things like- tarantino used a briefcase in those films (though they were never confirmed to related, it just stirred some stuff up with tarantino fans), or the fact that in every film he has a car boot opening scene and stuff. Maybe even get Tarantino to act himself, even though he dies in Reservoir Dogs, then stars as Jimmy in pulp fiction. - He could be like Cheech in From Dusk 'Till Dawn
It doesnt need to be a prequel like with this new Excorcist prequel for example. It should be a film in its own right, and only true tarantino fans, or pulp/dogs fans should notice the nice hints to the other movies.
why are you all talking about Pulp Fiction 2 here? i understand if there are rumors then there is talk, like with the Vega Brothers, but even THAT was complete bullshit started BY THE FANS. so why talk about Pulp 2? why? do you think QT reads this and thinks “ah the fans are right, lets make a sequel”. bullshit.
well there is a link on the MAIN PAGE of tarantino info
that says "Vega Brothers in pre-production and more"
and despite it not being confirmed, or even the next tarantino film, its something to talk about, bloody hell.
so what if its not a PULP FICTION 2, its just been referred to that.
[quote]… or the fact that in every film he has a car boot opening scene and stuff …[/quote]
[color=Red]Minor spoiler
There is no one in KB - vol 2, is there?
Yeah there is. In the coffin she pulls a knife out of her boot that looks like Vic’s boots. And in Volume one she looks at Sofia in the trunk like in Jackie Brown and in PF.
No matter what way we look at it a Pulp Fiction sequel would be successful because everybody loves the first film so everybody would go and see the second one which would make the film successful at the box office etc.
However it would be shit! Although no one will actually say this because it’s a Tarantino film!
hi every one, first of all I want to apology for my english because I’m a chilean guy. I need to know what was in the black suitcase. I know that it was something with gold but what was that exactly, because my spanish teacher thinks that it was the holy grial. He based in that because as jules was so religious and believed a lot in miracles, the thing that was inside the black suitcase was the holy grial.
Please if anyone has the answer of my question write to me to jauct@hotmail.com
I dont want to see an prequel or sequel for PF. It is good as it is IMHO. I don’t see what a movie could add, I am scared it would only raise high expectations, which eventually wil llet us down.
PF was a big surprise in cinema world. A prequel or whatever will not be that devistating. But then again, QT will be able to surprise us anyway. So, maybe I should just shut the fuck up. 8)
[quote]Yeah there is. In the coffin she pulls a knife out of her boot that looks like Vic’s boots. And in Volume one she looks at Sofia in the trunk like in Jackie Brown and in PF.[/quote]
Yeah I know there is one in vol 1 - that’s why I wrote vol 2 you know? And to the coffin-scene in vol 2, that’s not exactly a trunk shot, is there? My point is that there is no real trunk shot in vol 2, like in the four previous films.
[quote]
Yeah I know there is one in vol 1 - that’s why I wrote vol 2 you know? And to the coffin-scene in vol 2, that’s not exactly a trunk shot, is there? My point is that there is no real trunk shot in vol 2, like in the four previous films.[/quote]
Technically Kill Bill volume 1 and 2 are part of the same film. So as there was a trunk shot in Vol1 there was no need to put a trunk shot in Vol 2 becuase they are both part of the same film!! So QT has still got a trunk shot in all FOUR of his films!!
[quote]
Technically Kill Bill volume 1 and 2 are part of the same film. So as there was a trunk shot in Vol1 there was no need to put a trunk shot in Vol 2 becuase they are both part of the same film!! So QT has still got a trunk shot in all FOUR of his films!![/quote]
No, Kill Bill 2 was everywhere declared as Quentin’s 5th movie. So Kill Bill 1 and 2 are 2 movies!
[quote]No, Kill Bill 2 was everywhere declared as Quentin’s 5th movie. [/quote]
Where is everywhere?
Where was it declared that Volume 2 was his 5th movie because that’s new news to me?
[quote]
No, Kill Bill 2 was everywhere declared as Quentin’s 5th movie. So Kill Bill 1 and 2 are 2 movies![/quote]
that’s not correct. kill bill was hailed as Qt’s “4th movie” and some posters called vol2 his “5th movie”, BUT then next year when the Versión Intégrale comes out, it would be his 6th movie, consisting of his 4th and 5th movie.
that’s just bullshit
it’s his 4th movie, no matter if split in two, combined or edited in various editions…
Yaeh, this filmposter (its small and therefor hard to see) says his 5th movie.
But ok, guess you are right. It doesnt bother me. I tought it was counted as his fifth movie.
sorry guys you’re wrong
bout there being NO REAL trunk shot in kill bill vol 2.
there is…
its the scene where the movie changes out of widescreen and
goes small… and its hard to work out anything.
but she’s in the back on the truck, and then she gets dragged out.
before getting burried.
back of a truck is as good as a trunk.
its technically a boot. therefore, trunk scene
You must read the post of our admin:
We consider KB as ONE movie, only shown in 2 parts.
It was ONE script and it was planned to be ONE movie.
Only during the editing QT came in the situation to cut it in 2 parts.
So if here some said that there was a trunk shot in KB, yes it was, cuz it was ONE movie and in the first volume we saw it.
And now we are waiting for KB the movie which is now edited together from KB Vol 1 and KB Vol 2.
I give a fuck of a poster which says the difference, cuz QT said again and again, that it is one movie…