[quote]talks. that’s all. nobody was ever confirmed for anything. i mean for most of the years nobody really knew anything substantial about this project.[/quote]
Oh, I know, but that idea must have been in QT’s head (the first question), and I wondered why he changed it (the second question). So my two questions still stand. ;D
[quote]so? there’s still men on a mission [/quote]
True, true, but I suppose how big the role is for this female character. I’m not anti the idea, just in my mind, a men on a mission film would be purely pretty much men on a mission with secondary female characters. A film which is largely men on a mission but has a main female role would be to my mind Guns of Navarone (don’t crucify me if I’m wrong, haven’t watched it in a very long time), and so I wouldn’t classify it as a men on a mission film per se, it just had that element in it.
[quote]Well he was mis-informed.[/quote]