The Quentin Tarantino Archives logo

Ever noticed that


#1

…at the begining of the movie Yolanda finishes her dialogue with “I’m gonna have to execute every motherfucking last one of you!!” and at the end of the movie she says “i’m gonna have to execute all you motherfuckers!!!” ??? ??? ???


#2

Yeah, on my German BMG DVD they have written that in the extras, I read it, watched the movie again, and they were right. A funny little mistake, Fuck it!


#3

I noticed it the first time. That was pretty dumb, but everyone makes mistakes, even QT.


#4

I never noticed that before, does this mean that QT isn’t perfect?


#5

[quote]I never noticed that before, does this mean that QT isn’t perfect?[/quote]

Yep, its the shocking truth :o


#6

Yeh, that part isn’t a mistake!!! It was done on purpose to show different perceptions of events! (See Pulp Fiction Collectors Edition DVD on the Enhanced Trivia track)


#7

I read that too. Another on perpouse mistake was when they shoot Bret Jules gun cocks back showing he has no bullets. But later when The Hand Cannon Guy comes out he has enough to shoot him without reloading. Collectors Edition kicks major ass.


#8

and then there’s the bulletholes in the wall in the apartment…


#9

PLUS:-Notice that when Mia and Vincent arrive at Mia’s place.Mia turns on the song “Girl,you’ll be a woman soon” and Vince says “I gotta take a piss”.then Mia waves her hands and says something like “That’s a litle more information then I needed” NOW look to the left of her,you can see a shadow walking next to her,but it can’t be Vince cause right after that the camera switches over to Vince again and he’s still standing still watching Mia.


#10

Or maybe…



everytime QT makes a mistake, it’s like: "fuck, we made a mistake, what to do? Euh, why not invent an intellectual explanation for it? Then as least the dudes at the forums know what to talk about."



And euh, we do talk about :wink:


#11

It’s not a mistake.  QT reused the footage from the beginning of the movie, and after she says “any of you fucking pricks move,” the camera angle switches to a profile shot.  At the beginning of the movie, the camera stays as a wide shot until she finishes the line and the credits start.  If the mistake wasn’t on purpose, then why didn’t he just reuse the footage of “and I’ll execute every motherfucking last one of ya” along with it?


#12

[quote]It’s not a mistake.  QT reused the footage from the beginning of the movie, and after she says “any of you fucking pricks move,” the camera angle switches to a profile shot.  At the beginning of the movie, the camera stays as a wide shot until she finishes the line and the credits start.  If the mistake wasn’t on purpose, then why didn’t he just reuse the footage of “and I’ll execute every motherfucking last one of ya” along with it?[/quote]

Nope,it’s definitly a mistake,read the script…


#13

In the script of Kill Bill, Yuki Yubari exists, and in the movie, she doesn’t. Is this a mistake? In the script of Kill Bill, you cannot hear Bill’s voice as he talks to Elle in the coma ward. In the movie, you can hear Bill’s voice. Is this a mistake?



You completely missed the point. All QT had to do if he intended to use the same dialogue throughout Honey Bunny’s threats was reuse the footage as he did in the second time the dialogue is used (second instance in the film, same occurence in the chronology of the film) when she says “Any of you fucking pricks move.” My point is if the difference of the two phrases that follow “Any of you fucking pricks move” were mistakes, then why didn’t he just use the footage from the beginning of the film so she says the same thing both times. I mean, it’s so fucking obvious. After she says “any of you fucking pricks move,” THE CAMERA ANGLE CHANGES BY NINETY FUCKING DEGREES. It’s NOT a mistake.



Then again, you think Mr. Brown is alive, so my attempts at convincing you are futile.


#14

[quote]Or maybe…



everytime QT makes a mistake, it’s like: "fuck, we made a mistake, what to do? Euh, why not invent an intellectual explanation for it? Then as least the dudes at the forums know what to talk about."



And euh, we do talk about  :wink:[/quote]

I agree. That continuity is really insignificant, particularly the Jules-Brett one, so I don’t think he worried about it, as he was on a tight budget and a short time-frame.



Euh Bono. Euh indeed.


#15

why did they shoot that scene twice like that? wouldnt it been cheaper and been exactly the same if they only shot it once?


#16

To be clever.


#17

[quote]why did they shoot that scene twice like that? wouldnt it been cheaper and been exactly the same if they only shot it once?[/quote]

QT’s an entertainer; he shot it like that so geeks like us coul have something to argue about.


#18

And um…to be clever.


#19

[quote]And um…to be clever.[/quote]

That’s kind of a given.


#20

Its definatley supposed to be their! As someone has said, he would have just used the same scene twice! Its to show the differences in perseption!