[quote=“Bad Max”]
Hej då mean good bye in english.
I could take this further, but It’s fuckin warm over here and I have a headache.
[/quote]
Sure.
Whatever fuckhead. Dig a grave and lay down in it.
[quote=“Bad Max”]
Whatever fuckhead. Dig a grave and lay down in it.
[/quote]
;D
;D
[quote=“Bad Max”]
This is not the Ify Vs Max thread so I’ll be leaving this thread.
[/quote]
Well done.
ah stop it already you two, one page of this BS is quite enough i´d say
Since QT wrote and directed the segment of four rooms, Is that included in this. If so where would you place it? Its after Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction yet there both better, there is really no advancement in that segment.
i love four rooms and i love QT´s segment, but nobody would rate a fourth of a movie over RD. i don´t even rate four rooms as a whole over RD.
my question was: since we got 5 mindblowingly awesome from the man after his debut film, what makes you fans like RD more than most of his other 5, or in some cases even ANY of the other 5?
for you ify: Kill Bill is one story, but it got released in 2 movies. 2 very different movies, which makes them both relevant to this subject.
his four rooms segment is just ok…i actually really dig the 40 mins of my best friends birthday much more than the four rooms segment, the dialogue (and im sounding like a broken record here but its true) is really fantastic in it. the rest of four rooms should be hidden from the world its fucking abysmal!
[quote=“Bad Max”]
Yeah, but it’s Elmore’s characters, he created them and probably half of the dialogue is Elmore’s (Haven’t read the book) and the plot is Elmores, Quentin brought the characters to the screen in a wonderful way, as much as I LOVE Jackie Brown, I’d rather have a 100% QT film than a adaptation or a remake.
[/quote]
true romance is so inspired by elmore leonard that it gets embarrassing sometimes. Would you say that goodfellas is 50% of scorses only because it is an adaptation? or that clockwork orange is 10% of kubrick because it is a litteral adaptation of the book?
[quote=“Bad Max”]
The 50% is not bullshit and you know it. If you’d bother to read my post I didn’t knock JB. I love it.
[/quote]
Ehhh? Maybe 70% EL/ 30% QT?
Lets go for another page or two.
i wish y´all could stay on topic, i really wish
[quote=“Crazy_Hattori”]
i love four rooms and i love QT´s segment, but nobody would rate a fourth of a movie over RD. i don´t even rate four rooms as a whole over RD.
my question was: since we got 5 mindblowingly awesome from the man after his debut film, what makes you fans like RD more than most of his other 5, or in some cases even ANY of the other 5?
for you ify: Kill Bill is one story, but it got released in 2 movies. 2 very different movies, which makes them both relevant to this subject.
[/quote]
Dude, it isn’t two seperate films just because YOU say so. You haven’t answered my previous post:
[quote=“Ify”]
Kill Bill was always one film. It was just broken up into two parts (volumes) and released seperately. If Volume 2 was it’s own film, why does it have the credits of Volume 1 in there? When Volume 1 was released, reviewers such as Empire acknowledged that you can’t really review Kill Bill until Volume 2 was out.
[/quote]
Very different movies? What the fuck does that have to do with anything? If it was released as a whole, the second part would still be very different to the first. It is the same story and it is the same film. If it wasn’t why are they now putting them back together as a whole? When it is released as Kill Bill, are you still going to say it’s 6 films? The film was simply too big to be released as one so they split it into two halves. It’s like a document you save to a floppy disc. When it’s too big, you use another floppy disc, cut the document in two and save each part on a different floppy disc. It is still ONE document. Kill Bill was a single production. They do not stand alone.
[quote=“tonyanthony”]
true romance is so inspired by elmore leonard that it gets embarrassing sometimes. Would you say that goodfellas is 50% of scorses only because it is an adaptation? or that clockwork orange is 10% of kubrick because it is a litteral adaptation of the book?
[/quote]
Exactly.
Ok, might as well post off-topic, seeing as how nobody has anything left to say on the matter, right?
Ify, Kill Bill was released in two movies. It’s not opinion, it’s fact. Dunno if you were around back then, but fans had to wait half a year before the second Volume was released.
Why it is important: Many people prefer Vol.1 over Vol.2, QT fans seem to like Vol.2 more. They are different in style and pacing and many things more, SO THERE IS A CHANCE you like one Volume more than RD and the other Volume less than RD, OR WHATEVER. You should consider both Volumes in your “favourite QT”-list.
i’m putting way to much time and energy into this stupid detail.
[quote=“Crazy_Hattori”]
Ok, might as well post off-topic, seeing as how nobody has anything left to say on the matter, right?
Ify, Kill Bill was released in two movies. It’s not opinion, it’s fact. Dunno if you were around back then, but fans had to wait half a year before the second Volume was released.
Why it is important: Many people prefer Vol.1 over Vol.2, QT fans seem to like Vol.2 more. They are different in style and pacing and many things more, SO THERE IS A CHANCE you like one Volume more than RD and the other Volume less than RD, OR WHATEVER. You should consider both Volumes in your “favourite QT”-list.
i’m putting way to much time and energy into this stupid detail.
[/quote]
You have yet to make a strong argument.
Why are the Volume 1 credits at the end of Volume 2?
What the hell does people liking Volume 1 better than RD and RD better than Volume 2 have to do with anything? Those are the same people that think the Kill Bill Volumes are two different films. I could say I like the first half of FDTD better than the second half and that I like the second half more than Spy Kids! It doesn’t matter which half you like more than which other half, they are still one whole film. Using your logic, if people like both parts equally, then does that mean they are both part of a whole film?
Fuck all this off topic bullshit. If the members have gotten this deep into a discussion, who gives a fuck which part of the forum it’s in. It defeats the whole purpose of having a forum. Sometimes these things happen, when you talk about something, occasionally you may drift into another topic, so sue us.
you want a strong argument? Here’s one:
Find - IMDb
See, it’s two movies.
OMG, i can’t believe i have to write this out for you, but OK: FDTD is one movie, they released it as “From Dusk Till Dawn”. Ok, take a deep breath. you ready?
Kill Bill consists of 2 movies, they were released as two movies, namely “Kill Bill Vol.1” and “Kill Bill Vol.2” In addition, there is a Cannes version that we have yet to see on DVD, appearently titled “Kill Bill - the whole bloody affair”
I know that is was supposed to be one movie ORIGINALLY, but STILL, it was released in two VOLUMES. The credits of Vol.1 are in Vol.2 because ot was, like you said, ONE PRODUCTION. a production that was split in two movies and released that way. whow.
By your “logic”, if you can really call it that, Matrix Revolutions and Matrix Reloaded are one movie, and the LOTR trilogy is one movie.
I demand a cookie now. Preferably with milk please.
Oh, and the “O RLY” picture, you know, the one with the owl 
[quote=“Crazy_Hattori”]
you want a strong argument? Here’s one:
Find - IMDb
See, it’s two movies.
OMG, i can’t believe i have to write this out for you, but OK: FDTD is one movie, they released it as “From Dusk Till Dawn”. Ok, take a deep breath. you ready?
Kill Bill consists of 2 movies, they were released as two movies, namely “Kill Bill Vol.1” and “Kill Bill Vol.2” In addition, there is a Cannes version that we have yet to see on DVD, appearently titled “Kill Bill - the whole bloody affair”
I know that is was supposed to be one movie ORIGINALLY, but STILL, it was released in two VOLUMES. The credits of Vol.1 are in Vol.2 because ot was, like you said, ONE PRODUCTION. a production that was split in two movies and released that way. whow.
By your “logic”, if you can really call it that, Matrix Revolutions and Matrix Reloaded are one movie, and the LOTR trilogy is one movie.
I demand a cookie now. Preferably with milk please.
Oh, and the “O RLY” picture, you know, the one with the owl
[/quote]
Hahahaha. If IMDB says it’s two seperate films, than it surely must be!! Dude, even QT has said both volumes are part of one film, they just happened to get split in to two (incomplete) films.
The Matrix 2 and 3 were it’s sequels. Same goes for LOTR. They were never one film to begin with, and were never going to be released as such. They each have their own opening and end credits.
Why do we get the Volume 1 opening sequence at the start of Volume 2? WHy do we get parts of Volume 2 at the end of Volume 1? The two volumes of Kill Bill are part of the same film and QT never lets us forget that when we are watching it.
I love how you finally make one post that gives reasons and you think it’s the be all and end all of the argument. the cookie comment was cute though. Idiot.
[quote=“Ify”]
Dude, even QT has said both volumes are part of one film, they just happened to get split in to two (incomplete) films.
[/quote]
I never said otherwise, goddamit. THEY JUST HAPPENED TO GET SPLIT IN Two,
YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MAKES…
…
wait for it…
TWO MOVIES!!!1111eleven11one
OMGSPLOSION!!
I just masturbated to Brianna Banks porn, otherwise I dunno how to handle you and your stupid posts.
kinda funny on the other hand though,too.
were is the OWL!?!?
edit: i liked your post better before the editing. way to start on the name calling, which i will not continue. probably.
i think you really don’t get it, which is kinda sad. Kill Bill was released as two movies. they have different released dates, each gets their DVD versions, it is a goddamn
FACT
yes, a fact.