[quote=“Sebastian”]
marv? won’t they pick stories unrelated to Sin City? would be better IMO
[/quote]
I didn’t think there were any stories in the Sin City books that don’t in some way relate to one of the stories already told in the movie. I’ve never really gotten into much of Sin City but I was of the understanding that all the full-length stories are happening within a week or two of one another and they always overlap at some point.
[quote=“armstrong”]
thank for information dude ! But I am sorry about Tarantino Sin city wouldn’t be great without Tarantino 
[/quote]
I really don’t think Tarantino not directing one scene is gonna make or break the film. As long as Miller hasn’t gotten too big a head after going solo and lets Robert do the heavy lifting it should turn out great.
As far as Mickey Rourke goes it seems like a lot of people are starting to think he misspoke or was just misquoted and what he was really trying to say is that he just wasn’t interested in talking about it right now because he doesn’t think it’s actually gonna happen and when he complained about the make-up he was making a joke. I wish the people who initialy report quotes like this would include audio. It’s hard to say exactly what he meant when all you’ve got is the words.
And with Depp, I think he was totally on board back when it seemed production was imminent but with all the delays in production he moved on. I think he’s got like three movies with Burton lined up right now so I’d say he’s out but I do remember way back when Sin City was coming out on DVD there were a bunch of rumors that if he were involved it would be a very small role (like two days of filming with how Robert shoots) in the second film and then a bigger role in the third. Who knows though.