everything about charles laughton acting is underrated. that’s too easy, bio, try again.
and thememe, you can’t bullshit a bullshitter. i’m sorry but michael bay’s film lacked a little something i like to call aesthetic. it is just a glorification of american values in the 1940s that he seems to live by with a few modern values thrown in (gettin dat ass, blowin shit up, keggers). the reason his characters come off as a piece of shit sketches not worth caring for are because he doesn’t care about them one bit. not at all. your reasoning just makes me want to roll my eyes. unless you can write like a 200 page book about why pearl harbor is an important addition to cinema, i can’t buy this.
