Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Containing everything about Tarantino's breakthrough masterpiece, this is the cult section for all pulp fans!

Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby luvandchaos » Fri Mar 18, 2005 5:44 pm

Unfortunately I saw "Be Cool" last weekend and im sorry to say it was probably the worst movie of the year. The attempts to stylize similar to tarantino were pathetic. From the trunk shots to the dance scene with uma thurman and john travolta, the whole movie was a terrible rip off of pulp fiction. Even a cameo from steven tyler couldn't make this movie good. Not to mention the "RisingStar" Christina Milian,(the ethnic version of brittney spears). Her acting was horrible AND she cant sing! Did any1 else see this movie and the the similarities it had to pulp fiction?
luvandchaos
 

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby Ify » Fri Mar 18, 2005 6:02 pm

They're actually used a trunk shot? Now that's taking it too far, the fuckers.
Image

"Movies are my religion and God is my patron. I'm lucky enough to be in the position where I don't make movies to pay for my pool. When I make a movie, I want it to be everything to me; like I would die for it." - QT
User avatar
Ify
Fucking Professional
 
Posts: 5486
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:51 am
Location: The Dark Side of the Moon

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby Johny_Exhale » Fri Mar 18, 2005 6:04 pm

horrible way to raise money
Johny_Exhale
 

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby Dillon » Fri Mar 18, 2005 6:14 pm

Talking about trunk shots just watched the trailer for Layer Cake (The film by Lock Stock producer Matthew Vaugnh / you can see it at Quicktime) anyway even he uses the trunk shot, and since Claudia Schiffer ( Vaugns girlfriend) would not even star in a QT movie because he did not want her too, but it's okay for him to use a QT trademark?
Dillon
 

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby Ify » Fri Mar 18, 2005 6:31 pm

Dillontino wrote:Talking about trunk shots just watched the trailer for Layer Cake (The film by Lock Stock producer Matthew Vaugnh / you can see it at Quicktime) anyway even he uses the trunk shot, and since Claudia Schiffer ( Vaugns girlfriend) would not even star in a QT movie because he did not want her too, but it's okay for him to use a QT trademark?


I think even Guy Ritchie uses trunk shots in his films
Image

"Movies are my religion and God is my patron. I'm lucky enough to be in the position where I don't make movies to pay for my pool. When I make a movie, I want it to be everything to me; like I would die for it." - QT
User avatar
Ify
Fucking Professional
 
Posts: 5486
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:51 am
Location: The Dark Side of the Moon

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby rec » Fri Mar 18, 2005 7:09 pm

Guys... you talk like Tarantino invented the trunk shot and is the only person in the world allowed to use it...  ::)
rec
 

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby luvandchaos » Fri Mar 18, 2005 7:55 pm

It wasnt even just the trunk shot. There were a lot of similiarities. They also stole the use of a sketchy pawn shop. Both had a star that signed a bad contract. Both had the dance scene with Travolta and Uma. Both had some1 shoot some1 at a coffee shop/dinner. There were A LOT of similarities. The way the director did it made it tottally unbelievable and that made the film loose substantial credability. It was just horrible..
luvandchaos
 

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby Johny_Exhale » Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:19 pm

F. Gary Gray is still the man though, i love that guy, cant argue with the man who created Friday,  its just a bitch when youre spoofing something in order to make money off of it (because thats whats being done)

imdb says:

"John Travolta suggested Uma Thurman for the role of Edie, wanting to re-create their chemistry from Pulp Fiction (1994) all over again."

my opinion? bullshit
Johny_Exhale
 

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby Bleach » Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:24 pm

I saw the commercial for it today, and this project is damn weak. Actually if I was an actor I would consider in what movies I act, I wonder if Uma really likes that project enough to act in it and try to do it good or only because she has nothing else to do, or is it the money. I mean it's fucked up, she's always been acting in shit movies too. If there were no tarantino she'd never get anywhere far.
[img width=500 height=66]http://i41.tinypic.com/9sqlpu.jpg[/img]
User avatar
Bleach
Fucking Professional
 
Posts: 1622
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 4:18 pm
Location: Latvia

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby luvandchaos » Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:32 pm

Bleach wrote:I saw the commercial for it today, and this project is damn weak. Actually if I was an actor I would consider in what movies I act, I wonder if Uma really likes that project enough to act in it and try to do it good or only because she has nothing else to do, or is it the money. I mean it's fucked up, she's always been acting in shit movies too. If there were no tarantino she'd never get anywhere far.



I agree with the exception of her role in "Gattaca" she was great in that movie.
luvandchaos
 

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby WhatsFonzieLike » Sat Mar 19, 2005 1:39 am

About Uma Thurman, I disagree that she was only good in Tarantino movies. What about Jennifer Eight, Hysterical Blindness, Dangerous Liasons, Gattaca, and Tape (small role but none the less a great movie and a great performance).
WhatsFonzieLike
 

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby Jot » Sat Mar 19, 2005 6:45 am

definitley, see's brilliant in gattaca and Dangerous liasons, and even in Get shorty......incidently I though thats why she and John travolta were both cast in the film, because it was the sequel movie?

though I think QT's movies have really credited her as a 'proffesional' actor, oppose to just a generic Hollywood preety blond
Jot
 

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby fattybassam » Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:26 am

yeah, Uma's been really good in every movie I've seen her in.  she always exceeds even the directors' expectations at the time.  She has that certain, how do you say, je ne sais quoi.  She speaks to the public.  She speaks to me and we've never even met.  But I think, to be honest, that if you ever felt like Uma didn't act very well in a movie, like in Month by the Lake for instance, yuo go back and watch it again and you'll see how perfect she was.  Very natural.  Her mojo hand is strong even if she doesn't think, she know it.
fattybassam
 

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby cyber-lili » Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:10 am

I haven't seen this movie, and I think that I won't like it.

But we can notice that the movie is from a novel of Elmore Leonard, and QT is really influenced by Elmore Leonard. So the dance scene, that someone shoot someone in a coffe shop, were probably already in the novel. So it had to be in the movie too, and QT had influenced himself with this novel before.

I haven't read this novel, I read a lot of Elmore Leonard, but not this one.

But after then, I saw in the trailer that the movie director wanted to do it like QT, and not much Elmore Leonard, so I understand that the movie must be irritating ! I support you on this point !  ;)
Image
User avatar
cyber-lili
Fucking Professional
 
Posts: 5460
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 11:13 am
Location: France

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby Dillon » Sat Mar 19, 2005 11:20 am

Okay just seen Layer cake... I mentioned earlier, pretty good film, but using a differnt version of the song 'Don't let me be mis-understood' as the closing song?
Dillon
 

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby Ify » Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:47 pm

rec wrote:Guys... you talk like Tarantino invented the trunk shot and is the only person in the world allowed to use it...  ::)


You obviously don't get my sarcasm. Also, I have no problem with other people using the trunk shot, it's mostly only related to QT though as he uses it in every film. When a film has similarities to a QT film, and a trunk shot is also included, it is just another similarity, they still took the idea from QT. If the film had no other similarities to QT's film(s), we wouldn't have even mentioned the trunk shot thing, but it didn't and we did.
Image

"Movies are my religion and God is my patron. I'm lucky enough to be in the position where I don't make movies to pay for my pool. When I make a movie, I want it to be everything to me; like I would die for it." - QT
User avatar
Ify
Fucking Professional
 
Posts: 5486
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:51 am
Location: The Dark Side of the Moon

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby sixteenblue » Sun Mar 20, 2005 8:59 pm

god. i saw be cool just because i wanted to see the dance scene. it was a HORRIBLE movie. i like uma i like travolta but this sucked! it was funny in one part tho..the part where steven tyler is explaining sweet emotion..everyone around me was all silent and listening intently and i was cracking up...i mean i dont really expect steven tyler to be a good actor but it was SOOOO bad!!! (and hilarious..)
sixteenblue
 

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby MiaRose » Sun Mar 27, 2005 8:45 pm

I haven't seen it, but one clip i saw on tv of the rock trying to do a monolouge was pretty funny
Image
"I'm not saying that we haven't, and I'm not saying that we have. We love each other, but we're almost too close now to be a couple. We had out life together on Kill Bill. It was like a marriage in every way." -Quentin
User avatar
MiaRose
Basterd
 
Posts: 782
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:01 pm
Location: England

Re: Be Cool/ Pulp Fiction

Postby Critchers28 » Mon Apr 09, 2012 9:20 pm

The film is a total rip off of Pulp Fiction. The Uma Thurman and John Travolta scenes are ridiculous, the dance, the way he looks at her is all the same shit!!

"Be cool" ... Jules Winnfield?

Harvey Keitel trying to solve problems?
Critchers28
Cowardly Lion
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 9:12 pm


Return to Pulp Fiction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

  •  
Featured Links
Here are some handy links you might find useful.
  • Django Unchained
  • Tarantino Archives Facebook fanpage
  • Kill Bill: The Whole Bloody Affair Facebook page
  • Feel free to propose others.
  • Django Unchained thread