After Django, Speculation Topic

Since the script’s been leaked (and I’m not going to read it) I thought maybe we could speculate about what might come after Django. Django Unchained’s not going to come out til next Christmas so it will be a while before we will start getting a lot of info, might as well talk about something else in this barely alive forum!



What genres should Tarantino go after next? What are genres that he should not try?



Should he do another historic film and if so when/where?

[quote]While Quentin Tarantino is relishing in the current commercial and critical success of both Inglorious Basterds and the newly released Django Unchained. There had been talk of these films being apart of an unofficial trilogy. It had been thought that Christoph Waltz would be the key factor in all three films. The third film has been given a working title by Quentin according to an interview with TheRoot (via ThePlaylist). Tarantino envisions Killer Crow as a film that could include a lot of excluded material from Inglorious Basterds. There had been a sub-plot that included black soldiers that didn’t end up making the film. Talk of a Basterds-prequel also hinted to this story of black WWII soldiers story being explored. He confirms that half a the Killer Crow script is already finished. While this sounds promising, recent talk from Tarantino suggests his 30’s era gangster film could be closer to production.



“There’s something about this that would suggest a trilogy. My original idea for ‘Inglourious Basterds’ way back when was that this [would be] a huge story that included the [smaller] story that you saw in the film, but also followed a bunch of black troops, and they had been f–ked over by the American military and kind of go apes–t. They basically – the way Lt. Aldo Raines and the Basterds are having an “Apache resistance” – [the] black troops go on an Apache warpath and kill a bunch of white soldiers and white officers on a military base and are just making a warpath to Switzerland… I was going to do it as a miniseries, and that was going to be one of the big storylines. When I decided to try to turn it into a movie, that was a section I had to take out to help tame my material. I have most of that written. It’s ready to go; I just have to write the second half of it… That would be the third of the trilogy. It would be [connected to] ‘Inglourious Basterds,’ too, because Inglourious Basterds are in it, but it is about the soldiers. It would be called ‘Killer Crow’ or something like that.”[/quote]


taken from http://celluloidandcigaretteburns.blogspot.com/

What if he combines this Killer Crow idea with the Gangster film idea? Multiple times in different continents. Like there would be a couple of chapters during the war and a couple of chapters back in the u.s. before or after the war with one or two of the same characters. That way it wouldn't 100% be a sequel to Inglourious Basterds but it would be something new.

[quote=“zeppelincheetah”]


What if he combines this Killer Crow idea with the Gangster film idea? Multiple times in different continents. Like there would be a couple of chapters during the war and a couple of chapters back in the u.s. before or after the war with one or two of the same characters. That way it wouldn’t 100% be a sequel to Inglourious Basterds but it would be something new.[/quote]

i hope he doesn’t do that because tarantino has already done half gangster films. all the glory in a tarantino 30’s gangster film is that it would be a full on gangster film. and i don’t think he will do another half gangster film

mixed with the Inglourious Basterds prequel.

i hope he does Killer Crow first to finish his historical revenge trilogy.