IMO: Django Unchained succeeded where Inglourious Basterds failed.

Welcome to the deep south, as an escaped slave goes on to get his wife back. Coming 2012
Post Reply
Cowardly Lion
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:59 am

IMO: Django Unchained succeeded where Inglourious Basterds failed.

Post by TarantinoRoyale » Thu Dec 31, 2015 6:20 pm

Inglourious Basterds came off, to me, as Tarantino's weakest project (still decent when all's said and done but very sloppy in my opinion). I went into Django Unchained with low expectations and it ended up being one of the best films I've seen in recent memory.

DU, despite being 15 minutes longer than IB, was tighter. It was nearly 3 hours long, but aside from shaving a minute off of the gratuitous slave-fighting scene there was nothing I would have cut. IB was shorter but I could have easily cut out a half-hour.

DU involves the characters doing things. IB involves the characters talking about doing things.

All of DU's main characters (Candie, Stephen, Brunhilda, Django and Schultz) all felt necessary to the narrative. Zoller in IB, despite taking up a fairly large portion of screen was more of an annoyance than a character. Shoshanna's lover Marcel doesn't have much character development.

Both films have a violent twist, but DU does it at a more unexpected moment during the contract signing rather than apeing off of Reservoir Dogs and saying "Let's kill everybody because we can".

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest