Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Once Upon a Time... in Nazi-Occupied France. Quentin Tarantino's latest!
Post Reply
User avatar
Lt. BioBasterd
Fucking Professional
Posts: 1881
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:53 am
Location: Milla's Womb
Contact:

Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by Lt. BioBasterd » Sat Dec 26, 2009 8:37 am

I have a great feeling ladies and germs, and I'm not speaking to you as a QT fanboy, I'm saying this as an avid cinema-goer, I've seen some of the "best" films this horrible year has to offer and Inglourious Basterds still stands very strong. I've seen Basterds more than five time already and the film just keeps getting better and better.

These are the contenders it will go up against:

BEST PICTURE

1- Up In The Air
by Jason Reitman (that Canadian won't win. Down with Canada, all the way down!)

2- Crazy Heart
by some indie guy. They should call this film The Wrestler II

3- Avatar
seeing that the competition is very weak this one will get a nomination

4-Wall *E
I think this was released in 2009. Not too sure :-\

5-Sherlock Holmes
You might laugh but trust me, it's gonna get a nomination

6- 500 Days Of Summer
directed by another indie guy.

You know when you have trouble filling up the slots, it just shows you how bad this year is, you know it's been a while since we've seen a great film that isin't about some loser of a person trying to succeed in life, I mean how many times do we have to see that kitchen-sink crap like Precious. I hope they don't overlook Inglourious Basterds this year, it was a crowd favorite, many critics enjoyed it - and it's towering over the other films this year, and it's already fucking late December, we're not going to see other shit come out. It's a down year compared to last year's awards. The only thing worth rewatching twice this year was Basterds.

User avatar
roulette67
Basterd
Posts: 813
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 5:34 pm
Location: Jersey Girl
Contact:

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by roulette67 » Sat Dec 26, 2009 10:24 am

Hey! Don't down Precious. It's basically a woman's film. I found it to be emotionally moving. And I'm not some delicate flower he watches all those Drama's and cries at the drop of a hat. Do I think it will be nominated for best picture??? No. And if it is, will it win? No. But I still enjoyed the movie and recommend it totally.

Even QT put it in his top 10 for this year. :P

Will Basterds win? It would be great if it does sweeps the Academy Awards. I have faith in the film and it's actors. But the Academy, well that's another beast all together. I never like their choices. But sometimes they do come thru and recognize a truly GREAT film. But not very often.
Image

User avatar
cyber-lili
Fucking Professional
Posts: 5446
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 11:13 am
Location: France

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by cyber-lili » Sat Dec 26, 2009 2:22 pm

Lt. BioBasterd wrote: 4-Wall *E
I think this was released in 2009. Not too sure :-\
Wall-E was 2008 and it was already nominated for the Oscars btw.

User avatar
Ordell Rodriguez
Fucking Professional
Posts: 1843
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:45 pm

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by Ordell Rodriguez » Sat Dec 26, 2009 4:53 pm

Swap Wall-E for Up I think. I'd imagine Star Trek would get a nomination ahead of Sherlock Holmes, but I seriously doubt either is gonna happen, too many Oscar appropriate flicks this year. I doubt Crazy Heart will get a nom either. No fucking doubt the Basterds are in though, so at least something right is gonna happen. But it's not too much of a stretch to imagine what happened to There Will Be Blood would happen to Basterds.

User avatar
Lt. BioBasterd
Fucking Professional
Posts: 1881
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:53 am
Location: Milla's Womb
Contact:

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by Lt. BioBasterd » Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:01 pm

Either way it's a shit year :P

User avatar
RatQuiRit
Fucking Professional
Posts: 1432
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: France

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by RatQuiRit » Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:23 pm

I'd rather see another movie win over Basterds. I've seen IB 3 times in theaters and I'm confident when I say it's QT's most uneven film. It's like it has no spine to hold it together or something. There is a very huge gap between best and worst scenes from this movie, something which I haven't witnessed with any of QT's films before.
Actually, the main reason why Basterds is a notable QT movie is because of the ballsiness of History reenactment and the fact that it turned out so well. I really, really loved the whole idea behind IB, but it really felt like it should have been a book more than a movie. And while it is his best script yet (IMO), the process of turning words into life didn't turn out as well as it should have, even if most of the actors were perfect in it.
For this reason, I think there's a lot of categories in which IB should be rewarded (Best script, for a start), but I'd rather wait and see a real complete, square, awesome, and 200% finished-with-no-rush film from QT win an Oscar than IB.

I'm saying that even if, in my opinion, IB was the best film this year, hands down. Also, I'm sure he'll win one someday, that's what I'm all for the "wait for the perfect movie".
I'd still be happy if IB wins it, but that'd put in jeopardy his possibility of having his truly best film rewarded.
Image
"Grief is idiotic...I choose nothing: It's not better, but grief is a compromise. It's everything or nothing."

User avatar
Sgt. Geoi Donowitz
Fucking Professional
Posts: 3690
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:14 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Contact:

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by Sgt. Geoi Donowitz » Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:50 pm

I thought it was brilliant, the way each chapter had a different feel.

Like, the first chapter is all business. It let's you know how serious the danger is, and how sinister and evil the nazi's are. You can feel what Monsier LaPedite is feeling, and you fear for him and for the Dreyfus'.

The second chapter, Inglourious Basterds, is more about setting up the mythology, and the Basterds are more like comic book super heroes. It brings you out of the tragedy you've just witnessed and gives you a sense of justice.

The third chapter is all about Shoshana's life, and introduces her properly. It slowly and methodically takes you from the fun of the Basterds back into the tension and peril that the first chapter acquainted you with in the face of Landa.

The fourth chapter feeds off the third by again, giving you hope with a desire to drive the characters on to defeat the asshole Nazi's. (though I will agree that the tavern scene was a little too tense for a little too long for me.) But you see the plan, as horrible as it is, being put together.

The final chapter is vindication. Every one of the characters converge, and justice is carried out. You walk away with a feeling substantiation. Every one of the characters got what they wanted.

It's brilliant, and I think it should definitely win some awards. However, I'm not in the voting committee, so it probably will get shut out. Perhaps Christoph will get a win though.

User avatar
jonitapani
Real McCoy
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:56 pm
Location: Finland

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by jonitapani » Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:35 am

I truly believe that Christoph Waltz will get nominated.
And probably and hopefully he'll win.
ÄLÄKÄ KOLISE!

*G*
Fucking Professional
Posts: 2569
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 8:30 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by *G* » Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:06 am

jonitapani wrote:I truly believe that Christoph Waltz will get nominated.
And probably and hopefully he'll win.
I really don't see how he can lose. But I guess he could when you're dealing with the Oscars.

User avatar
jonitapani
Real McCoy
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:56 pm
Location: Finland

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by jonitapani » Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:12 pm

*G* wrote:
jonitapani wrote:I truly believe that Christoph Waltz will get nominated.
And probably and hopefully he'll win.
I really don't see how he can lose. But I guess he could when you're dealing with the Oscars.
Yep, I think same way too. But the Oscar doesn't change my opinnion about Waltz's performance on Basterds. And we all know, it's fucking brilliant.
ÄLÄKÄ KOLISE!

User avatar
postmaster.general
Kiddo
Posts: 99
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:24 pm
Location: Making Luv To A Gin N' Tonic In A Bar In Hell
Contact:

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by postmaster.general » Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:25 pm

. . . the fix is in, inglourious will win the academy awards . . .

. . . and it deserves to. the film represents a glourious career comeback for q.t. after the weird/wonderful death proof. he gave the tarantino fan exactly what the tarantino fan wants -- a quentin tarantino-made war movie. the performances he extracted from his players are amazing and it truly is an excellent film. the departed won a couple years back and if that film is a reference then inglourious should win easily since inglourious is WAY better than the departed (also a great film) . . .

User avatar
Lt. BioBasterd
Fucking Professional
Posts: 1881
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:53 am
Location: Milla's Womb
Contact:

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by Lt. BioBasterd » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:21 am

exactly and the film is like a piece of American propaganda but in a very good and fun way. The Warner Brothers released pictures of that sort in the early to mid 1940s and this film has the same integrity and feel behind it. I see it that way, and that last scene where Landa gets marked and then that military soundtrack plays and you can't help but to cheer, a lot of WW II veterans were laughing with great joy and applauding, I'll never forget that.

User avatar
jonitapani
Real McCoy
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:56 pm
Location: Finland

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by jonitapani » Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:40 pm

Lt. BioBasterd wrote:exactly and the film is like a piece of American propaganda but in a very good and fun way. The Warner Brothers released pictures of that sort in the early to mid 1940s and this film has the same integrity and feel behind it. I see it that way, and that last scene where Landa gets marked and then that military soundtrack plays and you can't help but to cheer, a lot of WW II veterans were laughing with great joy and applauding, I'll never forget that.
Even though Landa is a villian, a "bad man", you gotta love him 'cause he is so carismatic and genious character. I didn't find Landa's marking very funny or joyful, though he had it coming. The most of the Basterds on the other hand are kinda stupid but still very funny and loveable. Both, the Germans and the Americans, can be loved and hated in the film. They are all just people, it doesn't matter which side they are on. Even though, it's easier to hate a Nazi and cheer for Americans. But I, myself, didn't find the Bear Jew scene so nice. Ok, I love the way it's written, I love the scene, but I don't really like the Bear Jew 'cause his yelling kinda destroys the mood that music makes before killing the Nazi. But I think it's intentional.
ÄLÄKÄ KOLISE!

User avatar
Lt. BioBasterd
Fucking Professional
Posts: 1881
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:53 am
Location: Milla's Womb
Contact:

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by Lt. BioBasterd » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:53 am

jonitapani wrote:
Lt. BioBasterd wrote:exactly and the film is like a piece of American propaganda but in a very good and fun way. The Warner Brothers released pictures of that sort in the early to mid 1940s and this film has the same integrity and feel behind it. I see it that way, and that last scene where Landa gets marked and then that military soundtrack plays and you can't help but to cheer, a lot of WW II veterans were laughing with great joy and applauding, I'll never forget that.
Even though Landa is a villian, a "bad man", you gotta love him 'cause he is so carismatic and genious character. I didn't find Landa's marking very funny or joyful, though he had it coming. The most of the Basterds on the other hand are kinda stupid but still very funny and loveable. Both, the Germans and the Americans, can be loved and hated in the film. They are all just people, it doesn't matter which side they are on. Even though, it's easier to hate a Nazi and cheer for Americans. But I, myself, didn't find the Bear Jew scene so nice. Ok, I love the way it's written, I love the scene, but I don't really like the Bear Jew 'cause his yelling kinda destroys the mood that music makes before killing the Nazi. But I think it's intentional.
Well you just have to remind yourself that these people killed 1/3 of the Jewish poulation by starving them and torturing them.........just horrid things. The Nazis were monsters and they had to be stopped in any way. Basterds were fighting fire with fire.

Mr.Pink

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by Mr.Pink » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:58 am

Lt. BioBasterd wrote: Well you just have to remind yourself that these people killed 1/3 of the Jewish poulation by starving them and torturing them.
Thats a good thing.

User avatar
Lt. BioBasterd
Fucking Professional
Posts: 1881
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:53 am
Location: Milla's Womb
Contact:

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by Lt. BioBasterd » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:02 am

Did you just call the Holocaust a "good thing"?!

*G*
Fucking Professional
Posts: 2569
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 8:30 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by *G* » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:03 am

I think he did, as a joke.
Last edited by *G* on Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

Mr.Pink

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by Mr.Pink » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:05 am

Lt. BioBasterd wrote:Did you just call the Holocaust a "good thing"?!
Just kidding in a serious way.

User avatar
Lt. BioBasterd
Fucking Professional
Posts: 1881
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:53 am
Location: Milla's Womb
Contact:

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by Lt. BioBasterd » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:11 am

You are forgiven my son. Walk to the light of eternal salvation and away from the depths of perdition. :angel:

Mr.Pink

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by Mr.Pink » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:16 am

Ok getting back on topic if anyone thinks IB will sweep the Academy Awards then you're crazy. I wouldnt be surprised if Invictus steals the show. It will be similar to when Forrest Gump won all the awards when we all knew The Shawshank Redemption was 10 times better.

*G*
Fucking Professional
Posts: 2569
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 8:30 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by *G* » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:20 am

Mr.Pink wrote:Ok getting back on topic if anyone thinks IB will sweep the Academy Awards then you're crazy. I wouldnt be surprised if Invictus steals the show. It will be similar to when Forrest Gump won all the awards when we all knew The Shawshank Redemption was 10 times better.
1. Forrest Gump and Shawshank both suck! HARD!

2. I agree, I.B. will NOT sweep the Oscars. Wasn't that good, and the whole year of films should just be swept under the carpet.

Mr.Pink

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by Mr.Pink » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:24 am

It amazes me how you dislike a great film like The Shawshank Remption. Its voted number 1 on the top films of all time by the users at the IMDB.

User avatar
jonitapani
Real McCoy
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:56 pm
Location: Finland

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by jonitapani » Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:04 pm

Lt. BioBasterd wrote:
jonitapani wrote:
Lt. BioBasterd wrote:exactly and the film is like a piece of American propaganda but in a very good and fun way. The Warner Brothers released pictures of that sort in the early to mid 1940s and this film has the same integrity and feel behind it. I see it that way, and that last scene where Landa gets marked and then that military soundtrack plays and you can't help but to cheer, a lot of WW II veterans were laughing with great joy and applauding, I'll never forget that.
Even though Landa is a villian, a "bad man", you gotta love him 'cause he is so carismatic and genious character. I didn't find Landa's marking very funny or joyful, though he had it coming. The most of the Basterds on the other hand are kinda stupid but still very funny and loveable. Both, the Germans and the Americans, can be loved and hated in the film. They are all just people, it doesn't matter which side they are on. Even though, it's easier to hate a Nazi and cheer for Americans. But I, myself, didn't find the Bear Jew scene so nice. Ok, I love the way it's written, I love the scene, but I don't really like the Bear Jew 'cause his yelling kinda destroys the mood that music makes before killing the Nazi. But I think it's intentional.
Well you just have to remind yourself that these people killed 1/3 of the Jewish poulation by starving them and torturing them.........just horrid things. The Nazis were monsters and they had to be stopped in any way. Basterds were fighting fire with fire.
Well, you didn't get my point. Of course I know that Nazis were monsters but most of them just were brainwashed and just following orders. The biggest monsters were the ones who were leading their soldiers. Either way, the things Nazis did, are not acceptable. And yes, of course I'm on the Basterd's side.
EDIT: And I mean that the some Nazi characters can be likeable. I don't mean that normal Gerry soldier can be loved, no way. Like Willi, who just had a son. Okay, he's a Nazi but he's also a normal man. And Hans Landa, how can you not like him some way? Okay, what he does is horrifying but he has something very likeable in him. But I in no way like Hitler or Goebbels etc.
ÄLÄKÄ KOLISE!

User avatar
jonitapani
Real McCoy
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:56 pm
Location: Finland

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by jonitapani » Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:24 pm

Mr.Pink wrote:It amazes me how you dislike a great film like The Shawshank Remption. Its voted number 1 on the top films of all time by the users at the IMDB.
Well, IMDB can't tell if someone likes it or not. But it can tell that most people like it.
I, myself, find that most of the IMDB ratings are same that I would rate them but some just are not.

But yeah, still amazes me too that someone doesn't like The Shawshank Redemption it's a good movie. But I don't still think it's the best I've seen.
ÄLÄKÄ KOLISE!

*G*
Fucking Professional
Posts: 2569
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 8:30 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by *G* » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:17 pm

jonitapani wrote:
Mr.Pink wrote:It amazes me how you dislike a great film like The Shawshank Remption. Its voted number 1 on the top films of all time by the users at the IMDB.
Well, IMDB can't tell if someone likes it or not. But it can tell that most people like it.
I, myself, find that most of the IMDB ratings are same that I would rate them but some just are not.

But yeah, still amazes me too that someone doesn't like The Shawshank Redemption it's a good movie. But I don't still think it's the best I've seen.

Every single time a big summer blockbuster comes out, it's in the top 5 on IMBD of all time. Do you really Mr. Pink follow shit like that? 13 year olds and people who don't know better vote in that IMDB poll.

And I stand by what I said, Shawshank has to be the most overrated "top 10" film ever.

User avatar
cyber-lili
Fucking Professional
Posts: 5446
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 11:13 am
Location: France

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by cyber-lili » Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:40 pm

*G* wrote: 1. Forrest Gump and Shawshank both suck! HARD!
Forrest Gump is def better than Shawshank.

User avatar
jonitapani
Real McCoy
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:56 pm
Location: Finland

Re: Basterds will sweep the Academy Awards

Post by jonitapani » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:22 am

*G* wrote:
jonitapani wrote:
Mr.Pink wrote:It amazes me how you dislike a great film like The Shawshank Remption. Its voted number 1 on the top films of all time by the users at the IMDB.
Well, IMDB can't tell if someone likes it or not. But it can tell that most people like it.
I, myself, find that most of the IMDB ratings are same that I would rate them but some just are not.

But yeah, still amazes me too that someone doesn't like The Shawshank Redemption it's a good movie. But I don't still think it's the best I've seen.

Every single time a big summer blockbuster comes out, it's in the top 5 on IMBD of all time. Do you really Mr. Pink follow shit like that? 13 year olds and people who don't know better vote in that IMDB poll.

And I stand by what I said, Shawshank has to be the most overrated "top 10" film ever.
Okay, I get yout point :) It's not like I would put Avatar so high as much it's now :D
ÄLÄKÄ KOLISE!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests