Texas blood money

[quote]Haven’t seen it yet but The Hangman’s Daughter (pt. 3) is a very fun flick!

[/quote]

I liked part 3 too, but how can you say that if you haven’t seen it? I agree with all of you sayin’ “Texas Blood Money” sucked though. It had so much promise in the beginning; seein’ Bruce Campbell on screen was like, whoa this is bound to be good. But he’s not in it for more than 5 minutes. I liked that scene when the bodybuilder dude was describin’ the massacre occuring during the shooting of a porno movie. That was funny. But other than that, it kinda bored me.

Scarface, by “it” i think he was refering to the special addition of FDTD that was brought up in the post before him, and then saying the FDTD 3 was a fun flick, which i’m assuming he did see.

[quote]


I liked part 3 too, but how can you say that if you haven’t seein’ Bruce Campbell on screen was like, whoa this is bound seen it? I agree with all of you sayin’ “Texas Blood Money” sucked though. It had so much promise in the beginning; to be good. But he’s not in it for more than 5 minutes. I liked that scene when the bodybuilder dude was describin’ the massacre occuring during the shooting of a porno movie. That was funny. But other than that, it kinda bored me.
[/quote]

When I wrote that I hadn’t seen Texas Blood Money - but I have had PART 3 on tape ever since it came out

anyhow - TEXAS BLOOD MONEY fucking sucked



what a HUGE waste of time

[quote]Scarface, by “it” i think he was refering to the special addition of FDTD that was brought up in the post before him, and then saying the FDTD 3 was a fun flick, which i’m assuming he did see.[/quote]

Oh, I see. Sorry mysterio, I misunderstood you. :slight_smile:

I ment Texas Blood Money was afun flick, I havn’t seen part 3.

I don’t think it was all that good. There have been worse mind you, but this isn’t really a good film IMO.

The first and original “From Dusk Till Dawn” by Rodriguez and Tarantino is great, the second is cheap crap and the third is shit banned on celluloid. Sorry, but part 2 and 3 are not worth watching, they’re crap.

I’ve only seen the hangman’s daughter and that was shocking, what a crap film. :frowning:

I am in total agreement, The first From Dusk Till Dawn was the best. I watched the sequel for curiosity sake and I wish to god i hadn’t laid eyes on it!, Quentin and Robert Rodriguez should have just left it with the first one. including the first one along with 2 and 3 was an insult to the original.

just around one or two weeks ago a friend of mine and i borrowed all three from dusk till dawn dvds, that was already a mistake because it was late at night and i was shit tired and just wanted to go home by the time the first fdtd ended, i was so pissed off the way they all of trilogies resembled each otheres plots…it is all about a bunch of naive americans that meet up with gangsters in this slut club in mexico and fight a bunch of vampires. the first one was cool ass though, but although im not an expert of rodriges movies, he is only a second rate film maker without tarantino and lump somes of money to spend on hoes and explotions.



i would say that the fdtd with that stupid western was the wackest of all, but on the other hand because i was very tired this influenced my judgment- if i remember some of the scenes i watched, it was quite good actually-like when they left that female wanaby outlaw hang and shitt it was quite cool, she shouldve died. or when that american couple walks through the hotel with all that fvcking going on-id like to check in to such a one.



and although texas bloodmoney was a disappointment some parts were still kinda fvnny-like when those guys just gett into this motel room and watch porn, i dont kinow why but that was fvnny-or when that muscular fvcking huge guy was fvcking this little itty bitty hoe-i dunno why but that was kinda fvnny-i think quientin still saved rodrigues dissapointing movie making talents even though he wasnt always credited for it. but all in all those would fdtd would all be good films to watch for entertainment, there not master pieces but there fvn.

[quote=“Inglorious_Bastard”]
I’ve only seen the hangman’s daughter and that was shocking, what a crap film. :frowning:
[/quote]

but the spaghetti western part was pretty well made.



texas blood money is undoubtedly the worst of the trio :-/(

No vampire movie is so cool than FDTD 1 :wink:

From dusk till dawn one is the greatest vampire film of all time, but part two was pretty cool too, I enjoyed it.

This film wasn’t whatit could have been. The story makes no sense at all ofcourse, but where in part one it was very fun, here it’s just silly. Sometimes this movie looks good, sometimes it’s funny, sometimes the acting is ok., sometimes the dialogue is good, something the movie ís scary, but most of the time this movie just sucks. And the effects also sucked. The bats looked like the ones in the '33 Dracula version. To bad.



4/10

yea but its a movie that you can not be taken seriously its a B movie but scott speigel i think the director was made intruder really good.

I hated this movie

IT isent that bad if you watch it knowing its going to be cheesy, hanngman’s daughter is far worst.

I prefer hanngman’s daughter.



I think Texas Blood Money there is a screenplay horrible, and TT almost don’t appear in the movie

yeh i agree Blood Money is the worst of the trio… id watch hanngman’s daughter again… mabye… but not Blood Mone…